"New England is solid across the defensive front, if consistently dirty. (How the Patriots' defensive linemen get away with dirty tactics is another of the officiating mysteries surrounding this team; Vince Wilfork stuck his fingers into Brandon Jacobs' eye Saturday night and the zebras, standing there, not only did not toss Wilfork but didn't even flag him.) Plus, the Patriots are adept at varying defensive tactics. Often, they play a conservative coverage-oriented look in the first three quarters, then, having lulled offensive coordinators to sleep, blitz in the fourth."
Thank you Gregg Easterbrook for bringing back the hate. The TMQB Column for today was typically uneven in the sense that some of it was well researched and some of it (namely the first several paragraphs) looked like they were designed to reinforce a preconceived angle at all costs.
For example, pointing out that the passing leader has never won a Superbowl kind of misses the point. You could point to TD passes, which are a better indicator than passing yards, and see that Peyton Manning, Brett Favre, Steve Young, Joe Montana, Roger Staubach, Terry Bradshaw, Kurt Warner, and of course Tom Brady all won Superbowls in a year they led the league in touchdown passes. Pretty good group of players isn't it?
But then he brings up a good conspiracy theory point later in the column:
Easterbrook makes a good point here that I never heard before. Probably helped Plaxico's whining after the game about the bad officiating, but of course he was perfectly fine with the constant no-calls whenever he went to purposefully take out Rodney Harrison's knees the whole game.
"Rules note: it was Giants 28, Patriots 16 when linebacker Gerris Wilkinson was called for pass interference against Randy Moss in the end zone, placing New England on the Jersey/A 1; the touchdown made it 28-23 and was key to the Flying Elvii comeback. I didn't see any pass interference on this play, did you? Wilkinson ran in front of Moss and held his hands up, facing away from the ball, but didn't hit Moss. Where was the pass interference? NFL Network announcers Bryant Gumbel and Cris Collinsworth declared that the penalty was for faceguarding. But the rule against faceguarding was abolished in 2005! When Collinsworth played, what Wilkinson did was illegal; now, it's perfectly legal. Once again, the Patriots benefit from a mysterious major officiating call in their favor. And NFLN guys, if you're going to represent the league, know the rulebook, OK?"
TMQB takes the time-tested "Patriots can't run the ball" angle to say why the odds are against them winning the Superbowl. The fact of the matter is, they don't need too and only use it to supplement short yardage and goal-line situations. In another two to three weeks everyone will also remember that the good coaches don't open up the playbook when they're dominating teams, even to get records. Remember the dink and dunk offense? That is your running game and it's easily the equivalent of a good running attack because of the Moss double-coverage deep threat, Wes Welker's quickness, and Stallworth's ability to create yards after the catch.
10 comments:
It is worth noting that faceguarding is precisely what was called against the Pats in last year's AFC Championship game, and which assisted monumentally in springing the Colts' comeback victory. Was that a "conspiracy" too?
Excellent point Adam! I had forgot that that was called in that game. TMQB has been weird this year. I don't remember him (ESPN or on NFL.com) going to such lengths to punch holes in a team before. But, that was the inspiration for creating this blog and not a "Patriots Rule" blog.
Thanks for the contribution.
John
Easterbrook has got to be a joke right? ESPN must keep him for the humor value? He never gets his facts right. The Patriots rushed for two touchdowns and a two point conversion. He can quote the ypc, but they got the yards when they needed them. They have been successful all year.
Notice how he fails to mention that the play was 2-8 on the interference, followed by a NE penalty on the next play, for illegal formation on Vrabel, (which clearly shows no such infraction on replay, on a formation that Vrabel has reported in on, on MANY occasions without incident). So, the "face-guarding" never actually proved to have an impact, since NE went back to the 6, and Maroney scored on what would have been 3-6. In essence, all his whining was about 2 yds. Hardly a terrible offense.
Strike that. the original PI call gave about 18-20 yds.
I think what bugged me most about TMQ this week was not the passage you quoted, but the paragraphs he wrote about "running the same play" to Randy Moss twice. It was called that way in the broadcast, but very quickly and in multiple sources in the postgame coverage, word got around that the 2 plays were very different. Coach himself, and Moss, both described in detail how it wasn't the same play. And yet 3 days later, here comes TMQ, spouting the same drivel that was debunked within an hour of the end of the game.
Gregg could at least do a little reading on Monday and see what other people are reporting before he submits.
[total aside]
Sports Guy had this link in his links column, great Coach B story
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/football/v-print/story/414420.html
If you'd already posted it, my apologies. Just wanted you to see.
After watching the NFL Replay version of the game yesterday afternoon, Cris Collinsworth mentioned that it looked like faceguarding but added that that wouldn't be called now. He went on to suggest that the defender never turned his head to look for the ball and that's why the call was made.
TMQ needs to get his facts straight, but then again, that would just interfere with his storyline.
(in Vegas, from Maine)
The portion of Glenn Etherbrook's article dedicated to the Patriots was as sophomoric as I have seen.
"Are the odds against the Patriots" because TB had the most passing yards?
Odds on the Patriots are 2/3.
Maybe the wiseguys out here don't know about the curse of passing yards.
I could sit here for an hour and bitch about this. Probably best not to.
This blog is good fun.
TMQ is a moron.
Thanks for your efforts.
Good post and this mail helped me alot in my college assignement. Gratefulness you for your information.
Post a Comment